<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Pathological Detoxifiers and Environmental Illness</title>
		<description>Comments for Pathological Detoxifiers and Environmental Illness at http://www.ei-resource.org , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ei-resource.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:43:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/Pathological-Detoxifiers-and-Environmental-Illness.html#comment-679</link>
			<description>Doh!  Well, hopefully Australia will follow Austria's lead and get with the program!  

Cheers! - bolam56</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:14:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/Pathological-Detoxifiers-and-Environmental-Illness.html#comment-677</link>
			<description>No problem, thanks for raising the topic in the first place  :)

Yes that is my experience as well. The term &quot;pathological detoxifier&quot; comes from the alternative medicine field and is not used in conventional medicine as far as I know.

I had a battery of tests done by functional testing labs around the time of my detoxification profile all pointing to chronic toxic exposure, nutritional deficiencies, gut problems, and liver detoxification problems. I took them to various specialists - (immunologists etc) and they were all dismissed out of hand. I was incensed when the immunologist told me that if his own children had ME/CFS (he didn't believe in MCS) he wouldn't waste his money on these tests. I had a lot of the answers to my suffering in my hands and here was a highly intelligent and educated specialist simply dismissing them with no consideration. I am sure things will change but this will take time... 

There are signs they already are. I now have a GP (who also has a biochemistry degree) who is very open and believes 1. that both ME/CFS and MCS are physical illnesses and 2. a lot of the things I suggest as treatment approaches could well be useful but he is bound by guidelines so can't prescribe them. He tried prescribing the probiotic VSL#3 which costs close to £100 a month only to find it is not sanctioned by our local healthcare trust.

I don't know if it was a typo but it's Austria not Australia that has joined Germany in recognizing MCS   ;)

P.S. I plan to write another blog this coming week on foods and nutritional supplements that address pathological detoxification.

 - Maff</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:00:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ei-resource.org/myblog/Pathological-Detoxifiers-and-Environmental-Illness.html#comment-676</link>
			<description>Hey Matt, thanks so much for following up on this...  

My work comp toxicologist would just parrot out his mantra of: &quot;at inhalation levels, these chemicals (glycols/phenoxyethanol) simply can not hurt you...  You'd have to drink them&quot;.  

As I researched the toxilogical profiles of these chemicals, I would often come across comments on the possibility of &quot;potentially sensitive subpopulations&quot; that might be reactive at lower than normal levels, but none ever discussed pathological detoxifiers.  

It seems doctors simply refuse to accept any medical condition they can't measure/confirm with standard medical (blood/urine/imaging) techniques...  Hopefully, with the tests you mentioned (caffeine, paracetamol/acetaminophen, and aspirin clearance) to demonstrate the potential for pathological detoxification, we'll have some much needed ammo in our war for recognition of MCS as a &quot;real&quot; disease. 

 PS  Great to hear Australia has joined Germany in recognizing MCS as &quot;real&quot;...  

Go Team! - bolam56</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:10:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
