Get Updates

Subscribe to our newsfeed to keep up to date with all the latest articles:


Print E-mail
Research - Allergy Research

 

 

Homeopathy. 2006 Apr;95(2):73-80.

 

Comment in:
Homeopathy. 2006 Apr;95(2):65-7.

 

An exploratory retrospective study of people suffering from hypersensitivity illnesses who attend medical or classical homeopathic treatment.

 

Launso L, Kimby CK, Henningsen I, Fonnebo V. The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) University of Tromso, 9037 Tromso, Norway. This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

The objective of this study is to describe patients who had treatment for hypersensitivity illnesses by general practitioners (GPs) or classical homeopaths (CHs) and the patients' self-reported effectiveness of the treatment received. The data stems from an exploratory retrospective study amongst 88 Danish patients (response rate 58%) suffering from hypersensitivity illnesses, who chose treatment from one of six GPs or one of 10 CHs who participated in the project. The patients themselves selected their treatment. The GPs or the CHs considered that the patient's treatment was complete or that the patient was in a situation of current 'maintenance treatment'. The patients' primary reason for consulting the GP or the CH was that they were suffering from hypersensitivity illnesses. No significant difference was found between the two groups of patients in relation to age, education and duration of hypersensitivity symptoms. The CH patients were more likely to be employed in teaching, research, health care or the social sector compared to GP patients. The two groups of patients were similar in respect of their health at the start of the treatment, 57% of the patients who consulted a CH experienced an improvement of their state of health compared to 24% of the GP patients. Both groups of patients experienced an improvement of their psychological health after treatment. Logistic regression analysis showed that the GP or CH was the only significant effect variable. The results are based on the patients' retrospective, self-reported effectiveness of the treatments.

 

PMID: 16569622 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Full Article Available Online

 

 

 

 

 

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busyDiscuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)



Find this article useful? Share it with others!
Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!
 
Next >