Social Links

Follow on Facebook Follow on TwitterFollow EiR on PinterestFollow EiR on Instagram

Xpert Access

×

Login To Get Involved!


Forgot your username?


Forgot your password?

×

Join Us At EiR Now!

DNRS Roof Banner

 

DNRS Interactive DVD Series & Seminars

Do Vaccines Cause Brain Damage?

 

 

 

By Cynthia A. Janak

NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Leslie Botha
970-231-2008
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Neurological Vaccine Damage Explained by Dr. Andrew Moulden

Pathological processes have been clinically silent — until now

May 26, 2009, Fort Collins, CO. Canadian physician, Dr. Andrew Moulden BA, MA, MD, PhD, and leader of the Canadian Action Party will join radio talk show host, Leslie Botha, safe vaccine advocate and researcher, Cynthia Janak and Dr. Judi Gerstung on Holy Hormones Honey the Greatest Story Never Told! on community radio, KRFC FM 88.9, Monday, June 1 from 6 to 7 pm MST. The show will be audio streamed via the KRFC web site.

For the past seven months, the popular talk show has focused on the dangers of Gardasil, Childhood Immunizations and the Anthrax vaccine that has been linked to the Gulf War syndrome. The hosts have interviewed parents, and medical experts as they strive to share information about the dangerous and toxic adjuvants that are used in the vaccine serums as preservatives and additives. After months of research and combing FDA, CDC and myriads of pharmaceutical documents, Janak and Botha discussed the link between vaccines with toxic compounds, and neurological damage. In February, on a show titled: "Gardasil Girls Give the Silent Faces of Autism a Voice," and with documentation in hand, they announced that the Gardasil vaccine and childhood immunizations were responsible for brain damage.

On June 1, Dr. Andrew Moulden, whose expertise is in neurobehavioral assessments of acquired brain and behavioral disorders, will be addressing how vaccines cause micro-strokes that result in neurological damage to those with adverse vaccine reactions. Dr. Moulden has chosen to devote his career to neurobehavioral and neurocognitive assessments and research based upon his PhD and Masters training rather than practicing clinical medicine. For the past several years Dr. Moulden has devoted his work to deciphering neurobehavioral sequelae associated with immune system hyper stimulation, neurodevelopmental disorders, "and ultimately to vaccinations as the common environmental trigger for several brain and behavioral disorders."

Dr. Moulden has just released a DVD series titled: Tolerance Lost, proving "in medical physiology and clinical sciences, by using new and old diagnostic technologies, that all vaccinations cause immediate and delayed, acute and chronic, permanent and transient, disease and disorders that cut across all organ systems." According to Moulden, damaged tissues are the result of impaired blood flow and blood "sludging" in the microscopic vessels of the circulatory system. Autism, ADHD, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), Anthrax (Gulf War Syndrome) Gardasil adverse reactions, specific learning disabilities, seizures and more are caused by the impaired blood flow — specifically to the brain.

Dr. Moulden stresses that "all vaccinations are causing the same neurological damages as wild polio and other 'vaccine preventable pathogens did in the past — albeit in an attenuated form. It is not the germs/toxins that are causing damage; it is the body's non-specific response to foreign substances entering it. All vaccinations are 'foreign substances.' Repeat vaccinations serially aggravate the underlying mechanisms of injury."

Now, with Dr. Moulden's expertise, lay people and practitioners will now be able to see the neurological damages, in real time, or retrospectively, in most that have been injured or who have died — whether or not they recognized at the time that injury/death was vaccine induced. The range of impairment -common to all vaccinations — is from clinically silent to terminal, (life ending) with the entire gamut of neurocogntive, neuropscyhiatric, and neuroimmunological derailments existing along a continuum of harm and end organ diagnostic labels.... including the proverbial "cause of death unknown."

The June 1 radio show will be a groundbreaking event because the question, "do vaccines cause brain damage?" will finally be answered.

© Cynthia A. Janak


 

 

Related Articles:

 

People in this conversation

  • No need to apologise for double posting. You make a very pertinent point - people at both extremes of the vaccine debate are harming progress in vaccine and immunological research. While it is vital to protect people from fatal infectiours diseases, open-minded investigations are needed to unravel the long-term effects of vaccinations in general and how they affect different individuals. We need to know why some people react badly and why others don't and then be able to determine this before a vaccine is administered. Please have a look at these articles for more on this subject:

    How Vaccinations Work (Th1/Th2 immunuty)

    Probiotics May Offer More Effective and Less Painful Vaccinations

  • Hi epigenetics, I've deleted your previous post. May I welcome you to the site and thank you for your contribution on this subject.

    As founder of the site it is my only hope that issues such as this are discussed openly and not dismissed out of hand for whatever reason, academic snobbery, politics, economics etc etc.

    My own health issues which I have struggled with from the age of 11 have taught me that all options need to be explored and it is this ethos that has enabled me to make progress in improving my own health. Don't get me wrong, I am a strong advocate of the scientific process....but only in its purest form where all hypotheses are tested adequately before being dismissed. For me however, my health has only improved by considering all theories and using therapies that have not [yet] been validated by RCTs. I had no option.

    Finally, I agree that the field of epigenetics will play a huge role in the medicine of this century and have a positive impact on the way we live in general.

  • But on the other hand the mainstream medical profession generally does nothing to explore ideas that are outside of currently accepted wisdom. It takes decades for an idea to be validated by properly designed trials and accepted into the medical mainstream. I don't know about you but my lifespan just doesn't accomodate delays such as that.

    This site is here to explore alternative ideas that are not considered by mainstream medicine at this time. If mainstream medicine had all the answers this site and others like it would not be so popular.

    I agree that evidence based medicine is important but unfortunately for people like us it has yet to yield any answers. I have been ill since the age of 11 and am now 30. I don't want to lose another 20 years of my life waiting for mainstream medicine to catch up with ideas that more pioneering doctors have already seen to work in patient populations.

    Of course it is important that we and our illnesses are seen as credible but in my opinion what is more important is presenting all ideas so that readers can evaluate them for themselves.

    In terms of vaccines - I have reported on the fact that thimerosal is unlikely to be a problem in light of recent studies finding that ethylmercury (the form in thimerosal) is quickly eliminated from the body and thus is likely to have little effect on the brain - unlike methylmercury from fish etc. Myself and this site are not vehemently anti-vaccine but I do belief mainstream medicine is also blinkered about their safety. Of course vaccines have saved and continue to save many lives but there is a logical argument that not everyone reacts to them favourably, particulaly those with immune dysfunction (autism, CFS, fibromyalgia, MCS, autoimmune disease, allergies etc etc). There are also increasing numbers of vaccines being given to children for non-lifethreatening diseases. Such childhood diseases may actually serve to strengthen the immune system and reduce the development of allergies, autoimmune disease, and perhaps even cancers.

    Anti-vaccine advocates need to accept the fact that vaccines do save lives but the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry also need to consider there is potential for adverse reactions in a significant proportion of the population. What is needed is screening to determine how each individual will react to vaccinations prior to their administration.

  • Maff, people like us have enough problems getting the mainstream medical profession to take us seriously as it is.

    If you start giving the impression that we're aligning ourselves with the anti vaccine advocates, we stand no chance.

    Free speech is all very well. Sensible, thoughtful speech that thinks about the consequences of what it's saying is another thing altogether.

  • Ataraxy, this article was posted by myself (as all articles except personal blogs and forum posts are).

    You have to understand that the purpose of this site is to present information from all viewpoints and let readers decide for themselves what is accurate and worthwhile and what is not. As the site disclaimer states, the information on this site is not intended to replace professional medical advice. The responsibility for what people do with the information they find here lies solely with themselves. This is standard practice on any health-related website.

    I am all for the scientific process in its purest form but like every aspect of society it is open to bias, vested interests, and plain incompetancy. Valid research proposals often fail to receive funding and perfectly good studies often do not get published, for reasons other than a lack of quality.

    This site is about free speech so I happy to present ideas that may not have had coverage elsewhere. If visitors who are knowledgeable about the specific subject can point out any flaws in the arguments presented then that is great. I simply posted this news release in case visitors might be interested in listening to the radio show discussed ;-)

  • Out of interest, who posted this article and why?

    Given that this is a highly contentious subject, and as Dr Moulden is contentious even among anti vaccine advocates, shouldn't it have some sort of health warning? People come here looking for help, and sending them off in this direction is unlikely to do that.

    Like GaryTiv, I don't worry about hearing about things that I don't agree with, but I do worry about articles like this misleading other people. Is the poster of this article prepared to take responsibility for that?

    If Dr Moulden has found something, let him publish it so that the scientific community can review it, not try and create the impression of a breakthrough using the media. Just think back - how many times have we seen "scientific breakthroughs" that were released to the media rather than through published journals generate a whole lot of noise, only to be discredited in the long run?

  • Hi all. As founder of this site I'd just like to clear a few things up. I'm glad this news release has sparked a debate as this is what the site should be about!

    More importantly, you do not need to have registered to be able to write comments as epigenetics has done here. You only need to register to post in the forums and write blog entries.

    Gary - Please rest assured that although as site administrator I have the ability to ban users or delete comments, I do not do so unless foul language is used, someone is personally attacking another visitor/user, or a comment is clearly SPAM. Epigenetics never had a profile because he/she did not register.

  • Interesting discussion, but can anyone explain why the profile of "epigenetics" no longer exists?

    If it has been deleted by anyone other than the person who set it up, then I will be deleting mine. I personally do not "worry" about hearing any views that I don't agree with.

  • epigenetics - you don't seem to be a member here, so I'm not sure why you see the need to join in this conversation. In any case, my comments aren't directed at people who are convinced anti vaccine advocates. However, I do think that it's important for other people to know that not everyone accepts that Dr Moulden has any answers.

    You can't assume that researchers would have discovered that, researchers haven't discovered alot of things.


    Given the amount of research that has been done on autism I think that it is a pretty safe bet that researchers would have discovered if it was caused by micro strokes. After all, if they're so hard to detect, how has Dr Moulden detected them?

    Just look at this YouTube video of Dr Moulden. He also claims to have cured prostate cancer, cervical cancer and breast cancer (7:05). This is so unlikely, that I don't think that this guy is worth worrying about.

  • Dr Moulden's proposals sound seriously flawed to me. I've never heard of autism being due to micro strokes before, and given that they should be pretty easy to detect, it seems highly unlikely that none of the major autism researchers would have discovered it.

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0 Character restriction
Your text should be more than 25 characters
Your comments are subjected to administrator's moderation.
terms and condition.

Adsense Responsive BottomBanner